Search for: "Love v. Merck Sharp "
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
One such instance is Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others [2014] EWHC 3867 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Mr Justice Nugee of 21 November.Readers may remember that this trade mark spat has already featured several times on this blog. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
| US trade secrets | Trends in IP Data | EPO's new Chief Economist | GIFs and copyright | Katcall for new positions in the IPKat team | Star Wars IP.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 31 January] – The AmeriKat from the Silicon Valley | INGRES conference on developments in European IP law 2015 - patents | Economics of UK creative industries |Stretchline v H&M | Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp &… [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 2:20 pm
Among other exciting duties, those who will get the positions will have the honour to keep writing these lovely weekly round-ups. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Mercks clash over law governing coexistence dealThe Merck v Merck trade mark dispute (real name: Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others) has already appeared a couple of times on this weblog [see here and here], with the further honour to have a dedicated poll on who between the Germans and the Americans should have right to use that much-contended name. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:57 am
Inc.), Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. and Merck Sharp & Dohme is upon us. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
A couple of days ago, we watched the lovely “St. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
****************** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never Too Late 72 [week ending on Sunday 15 November] – Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical | Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd | Economics of internet trolls | UK IPO scammer scammed | Video conferencing at the EPO | Warner-Lambert v Pfizer in France | African Ministerial Conference in IP |… [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
I BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product I Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]
